Sunday, June 16, 2019

Surrogate motherhood Dissertation Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words

Surrogate motherliness - Dissertation ExampleSurrogate motherhood is a theme that evokes numerous opinions. There are many supporters of surrogate motherhood as well as many opponents. Neither of them is right or either of them is right in their own way. This research project is not pore on considerations of opponents or proponents. The literature review presented further on is focused on a current ikon of surrogate motherhood. It is supposed that it is relevant to reach for surrogate motherhood to women who dedicate already given birth to their own children. Physical and emotional load of surrogate motherhood is evident and it is not an effortless labor. There should be no commercial-grade spirit of surrogate motherhood, but it should be paid like any other kind of labor. Legal sentiment of surrogate motherhood A common surrogate motherhood criticism is determined by the claim that it is impossible to buy or to sell a child. A child is not a commodity and money relationship is irrelevant from this perspective. In the New York State Task Force on disembodied spirit and the Law it is concluded that the exchange of money for possession or control of children.., threatens to erode the way that society thinks about and values children, and by extension alone human life Thus, from this perspective, a childs birth is the natural outcome of a certain deal and it can be transferred from one society to another for money. A supposition that children in this case are treated like commodities can be contradicted by the fact that sometimes parts of a human body are treated like objects (Meehan, 2000). It can be argued that commodities require cleaning, cherishing etc, so it is not wrong in this context to treat children as commodities or objects. Thus, it is relevant to consider in this context people who pay money to buy a child from a surrogate mother. A genuine treatment is usually guaranteed to a child who is bought. From another perspective, such kind of an immoral treatment is irrelevant, because children are not commodities from the very beginning. Babies are given by God and it is not proper to sell or too buy them. With this respect one may argue that for example, when an individual wants to meet his spouse he pays for a matrimonial agency. But in this case a future tense spouse is not bought it is just a money transfer to a matrimonial agency. Thus, it can be said that not a child is bought, but services of a surrogate mother are bought. Moreover, the services of a commercial surrogacy agency are bought. At this point it is relevant to talk about surrogacy arrangement. It is a cruel reality of the modern world that parents want to become levelheaded parents and receive custody rights and for this purpose they have to pay a certain sum of money. A surrogate mother wants to get money for her services of electric charge a child since it is a hard work to bear a child. An interesting suggestion is provided by In a commercial surr ogacy agreement, the commissioning touch could be thought of as buying particular services from the surrogate mother. But it is not necessary to suppose that anything at all is bought or sell (Mitchell, Pellegrino, Elshtain, Kilner & Rae, 2006). In this case obligations of one party imply that it gives money to another party in case obligations are fulfilled. This is a pragmatic paradigm that is a great deal discussed in the contemporary researches and studies in this field. Therefore, we can surely claim that no illegal basis lies in terms of these contracts. There is a well-known paradigm suggested by Blyth and Potter, who claim that surrogacy does not imply buying or selling children, because future parents might even imagine that they have purchased a particular baby.., what they have paid for is not necessarily the same as what they think they have paid for (Mclachlan&Swales, 2009). This is an interesting claim and it is worth considering. There is such kind of cases, when fu ture parents rejected to take the baby from a surrogate mother when it has already come into the world. Therefore, a legal

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.